<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easter Dinner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanhstrauss.com/blog/2006/04/easter-dinner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanhstrauss.com/blog/2006/04/easter-dinner/</link>
	<description>A view from the middle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 18:29:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jonathanhstrauss.com/blog/2006/04/easter-dinner/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanhstrauss.com/blog/2006/04/easter-dinner/#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>ooooohh, good one sylvia!!  i love it when you and jonathan argue over semantics.  if only this product allowed html in comments, i would link back to when he pointed out that you should use &quot;post&quot; instead of &quot;blog.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooooohh, good one sylvia!!  i love it when you and jonathan argue over semantics.  if only this product allowed html in comments, i would link back to when he pointed out that you should use &#8220;post&#8221; instead of &#8220;blog.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia Yam</title>
		<link>http://jonathanhstrauss.com/blog/2006/04/easter-dinner/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Yam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanhstrauss.com/blog/2006/04/easter-dinner/#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d also like to comment that it was ravioli and not so much spaghetti.  i mean, if we&#039;re getting technical.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d also like to comment that it was ravioli and not so much spaghetti.  i mean, if we&#8217;re getting technical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jonathanhstrauss.com/blog/2006/04/easter-dinner/#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanhstrauss.com/blog/2006/04/easter-dinner/#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>i still maintain that they were hott (two ts).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i still maintain that they were hott (two ts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

